The
fundamental linkage that I see revolves around the central principle of
sustainability -
At the
planetary level resource allocation is a zero sum game - all life on Earth is
entitled, by being life on Earth, to a proportionate share of the planetary
resources. Any aggregation of resources beyond the entitlement of an individual
(or the many individuals of a group), on the part of one group or entity,
occurs as a direct function of loss of resources by one or more other entities
or groups. Sustainability says that we live in such a way that we get the
benefit of the planetary resource flows, and we preserve that maximum benefit
and value of those flows for everyone else as well.
All
human wealth is a derivative function of natural resources, co-opted
unilaterally by humanity for personal enrichment or improvement of material
well being (in the last three hundred years bolstered by the Christian notion
of eminent domain or human dominion over Nature, but extant long before that
philosophy rose. There has always been a way to justify taking what is wanted
regardless of the intrinsic right to it. The fundamental mechanism of this
appropriation is to minimize the value or rights of ALL other living creatures
including people not of the exalted “group”, while maximizing the rights and
authority of the exalted group). The initial construct for doing this may have
been when we aggregated people into large groups (the better to fleece them) -
the creation of cities.
Thus, In
any situation where someone is aggregating wealth beyond their need or
effective requirement, much less beyond their intrinsic entitlement, they are
doing so at the substantial expense of the material well being of others, in
most cases many others, including the natural realm, which is being massively
depleted of resources that are intrinsically valuable to planetary resource
flows, in many cases in ways we are only just beginning to understand. This is
the study of ecological services, with humans included in the ecological
equation - an emergent science.
Climate
inaction occurs for many reasons but the predominant one is the engineered
and/or coerced response of the consuming public who represent the engine of
consumption that is the defining purpose for the predatory industrial
capitalist regime, and who, in the best interest of regime but
definitively NOT the planet, just keep on consuming. It is through this
process that the multitudes convert & transfer the value of their lives and
their share of the planetary resources to the exclusive use of a few - the
oligarchy or plutocracy (whichever you prefer). It is good to remember that
pigs are not encouraged to consume as they do so that they may become liberated
and better pigs. They are encouraged to consume so that they may be better TO
consume!
The
"market" economy that is used to accomplish this, in the name of
"sustaining the multitudes at a higher standard of living" requires
three things for it's functional success - endless raw materials, endless
consumption, and endless capacity to absorb waste… none of which are present,
by definition on a finite planet, with the narrow exception that Madison Avenue
expends ever greater sums of money to convince the consuming public to keep on
consuming and, in fact, to consume MORE!
There is
no functional view of the future that is accomplished through either investment
or regulation, both of which are machinations of the oligarchy for control. The
only realistic path forward takes us back to square one with a new recognition
of what we are actually and functionally entitled to of the planetary resource
share, acceptance of a new view of value and transfer of value that is not
expressed only in terms of the predominant form of value transfer today
(money), and which takes an entirely different approach to ownership,
recognizing the commons as the paramount value. I would suggest that in such an
environment, incentives will probably be more productive than regulation, with
the primary incentive being that the global village recognizes that it's very
life and happiness are based on planetary equilibrium and health, not
essentially the health and well being of any individual, but of ALL
individuals… human or otherwise.
Money as
currently construed and applied, is itself a coercive and destructive process,
especially when it degenerates, as most world currencies now have, to being
both fiat (backed by nothing other than promises) and debt-based (all money is
"created" as a function of debt). This is a profoundly destructive
force, at the very center of that global wealth transfer and aggregation that
underlies the predatory industrialist capitalism and market economy. The rigged
process by which money is literally made and controlled is the reason for
"inflation" and "deflation" and the fact that your
"worth-less" now than you were twenty years ago.
Predatory
industrial capitalism is a classic example of the quote ""Power tends
to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always
bad men." by Lord Acton, expressing his opinion in a letter to Bishop
Mandell Creighton in 1887, or a similar quote from William Pitt The Elder, Earl
of Chatham & British PM in a 1770 speech to the House of Lords, in which he
said "Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess
it."
Thanks for being there and being you ... and thanks for reading this!
The Smokemaster
No comments:
Post a Comment